Bhopal16 minutes in the past
- Copy hyperlink
Satpura Bhavan (File Photo)
- Major irregularity in placement of fifth UGC pay scale, 8-10 lakh rupees to a professor
- 10 to 15 thousand rupees. Month additionally getting profit, misuse of 5 years service necessary situation
Major irregularities have come to gentle in the placement (placement) of the fifth UGC pay scale being given to professors of faculties in the Department of Higher Education. The MP government carried out the fifth UGC pay scale in 1999. Under this scheme, the profit of lakhs is at present being prolonged in an unconstitutional method by giving exemption to the requirement of 5 years of service in the senior scale to the eligible school in the scheme.
In this division, the school working as OSD in departmental ministry and directorate took benefit of it by manipulating the guidelines of mill with administrative officers for his or her profit. At the similar time, almost 300 professors like him additionally obtained fallacious advantages. Due to this, the state government has misplaced greater than 300 crores throughout the transition interval of this korana.
From this, a professor is getting 8 to 10 lakh rupees arrears. Also, 10 to 15 thousand monthly is getting extra profit. The particular factor is that for this, the consent given by the Finance Department for the UGC seventh Vetamanam is being utilized in the wage placement orders in a lawful method.
OSD stage officers gave advantages to school
1 UGC mandated 5 years of service in the senior scale for fixation in the fifth UGC pay scale and exemption was given to these professors who had been mounted in the 1986 scheme. But OSD stage officers misinterpreted the guidelines and in addition gave the profit to the ineligible school of 1996.
Order for re-test in case of rest of 5 years
2 An rationalization was issued in 2008. In this, 5 years service of all school in senior grade was made necessary for choice grade. Due to this, a whole bunch of petitions have been filed in the High Court by the Senior Faculty. In which the court docket thought-about the motion taken by the rule to be fallacious. In the case of giving them 5 years exemption, ordered re-testing.
Controversy ends, but wrongly benefited
3 The Department appearing on the order of the court docket, ended the order issued on 13 December 2019, the dispute brought on by the clarification order of 2008. Even after the dispute was over, the division wrongly ignored the pay scale order and the junior school was unjustly exempted from obligatory 5 years in senior scale.
To my information, not the case, will probably be associated to the restoration
This episode will not be to my information. It has not been a lot time for me to take cost of Higher Education Department. But if there’s such a factor, will probably be investigated objectively. Recovery may also be carried out from the involved if the reality is discovered.
Dr. Mohan Yadav, Minister, Higher Education Department